I spent the last week travelling down to Lisbon from Bilbao and then back up through France. I did this on my BMW K1300s. I had to speak at a Conference nr Lisbon and I thought why not take the bike rather than fly.
Firstly, can someone explain that why it is that in Spain, Portugal and France, diesel is significantly cheaper than 95 petrol whilst in the UK the differential is the other way. There must be an element of profiteering gong on in this country.
Secondly, the sheer scale of road building that has recently gone on in Spain,Portugal and France and indeed continues to go on is staggering. Coming up from Dax, there was 40 miles of continuous work going on. In Spain, major new highways continue to be built. This shows that there is an understanding of the benefit of public works and that there are politicians who are able to get things done.
Thirdly, in Lisbon where I had to have a new rear tyre fixed at the main BMW dealership – it wa heaving with servicing and new sales in the car side of the dealership. However, interestingly they refused to take payment in any other form but cash. This shows German faith in the short term future of the Euro!
Whilst waiting, I visited the waterfront in glorious sunshine. New developments with many new apartments for sale and half the cafes that had only recently opened, now closed and boarded up
In all the trip I had not the slightest problem getting a hotel room, although half the price in Iberia than they were in France.
Finally, if you want some really spectacular motorcycling, head for the mountains in the middle of Portugal
The US consultancy BCG reports the massive boost to US manufacturing that has been provided by fracking. US industrial electricity prices are now up to 50% lower than other major exporters. The result, US manufacturing costs are only 5% higher than China. The US has a 15 year lead on other nations on fracking which will see this edge grow.
We worry about poor manufacturing performance and weak exports. Looking at the Lancashire decision last week, I don’t really think we as a nation care that much about our global economic performance.
As we approach the end of the year, I thought I would reflect on the achievements and challenges facing the LEP.
It has been 8 months since I was appointed and I believe much has been achieved, built on the firm foundations laid down by my predecessor. The Growth Deal, implementation of the City Deal, an AGM, effective working relations with a host of Partners – particularly the Local Authorities, and the recent signing off of new Governance arrangements, position the LEP well for the future.
With the Growth Deal, City Deal and European Funding, £250m of public money will be coming into our LEP over the coming years, which will itself lever in very substantial amounts of private sector investment.
I have spent time in London promoting amongst politicians, the civil servants, and indeed any one that will listen, the benefits of doing business in the area and the good work that is carried out under the brand of the LEP.
I have been struck by the desire by Partners to work for the common good, and by the commitment of the core staff working for the LEP.
Of course, we have been helped by the growing strength of the economy and the confidence that business shows in investing not only in our patch, but in the UK as a whole. No better has this been exemplified than with the opening of the JLR engine plant at i54.
So what of 2015? We know that a General election will be held in May – a result that is certainly difficult to call. No matter who is in power, we also know that very difficult decisions will have to be taken regarding public expenditure and it will be a responsibility for us all to ensure that the maximum value is squeezed out of every pound of taxpayers money.
It is also clear that the Scottish referendum let the genie out of the bottle in respect of devolution.
We need to ensure that the LEP focuses on delivery of the City and Growth Deals and is not sidetracked by discussions on potential new structures. Delivery will dominate the agenda for the LEP. We bid for projects through the Growth Deal, we gave assurances to Government that we were capable of delivering these on time and on budget. We now have to get on with doing exactly that.
The most concerning aspect of my time has been the endless complaints by business on the difficulties in finding skilled labour and the poor employability skills of many of those seeking work.
These issues have been flagged up for decades and despite the billions of taxpayers money that we have spent, we appear to have made little progress. Where did the money go?
So this to me is the main challenge for 2015. We have an Education Trust, it has been given a central role in the LEP. It now has to be given the teeth to function. To do this we have to be able to determine precisely what skills business needs now and in the future. On the back of this we have to align Further Education and the key training providers to meet these needs and we have to incentivise local people to take the jobs on offer. Importantly, we have to get into schools and build extensive links with business.
Employment is intertwined with Immigration which will continue to be central to political debate. The LEP has a responsibility to ensure that the benefits to business are expressed. Visits to farms across the County have highlighted the vital contribution that Eastern Europeans make to our local economy.
The work of the LEP will be set against a global economy that is some turmoil – would any of us at the start of the year predicted the collapse of oil prices and the current meltdown of the Russian Economy?
What my time at the LEP has taught me is that we are well placed to face any coming storms. We have a diversified economy anchored by JLR in the south and JCB in the north. We have a resurgent ceramics sector, and a host of engineering companies exporting to countries across the globe. We have two excellent Universities. Our location at the heart of the country with good communications means we are attractive to professional services and distribution. National tourist attractions including Alton Towers and Drayton Manor put us in the public eye. We have a truly balanced economy.
So in 2015, we will raise the profile of the LEP and concentrate on delivering the the key investments which will benefit the businesses and people of Stoke and Staffordshire, and we will continue to shout about what a great area this is to do business.
We are all about creating more jobs, better jobs and higher paid jobs for local people
Can I wish you all a Happy Christmas and prosperous New Year.
Chairman – Stoke on Trent and Staffordshire Enterprise Partnership
A practical example of the benefits.
Caught the train from Euston to Birmingham International. Arrived Coventry at 6.15pm where a group of middle aged drunks jump on – effing and blinding. Police support followed them onto train but did nothing.
Got off at International to total gridlock. No one able to get off car park, so abandoned it and hopped on train to New st.
Absolutely no local radio announcements on reason for problems and no sign at all of police taking control of the chaos.
When I got to New St, most trains out of this abonimation of a station delayed and looking outside it is difficult to see if any progress has been made over many months with the tramway.
So a very simple issue where a whole range of agencies were involved, but no one in control, and importantly no one who can be held to accountable.
Imagine a powerful City Mayor who could grab hold of this. Having control of Rail; Roads; Police and communication and be accountable for delivery. Would performance not be driven up?
I think it would.
The media briefing over the weekend focused heavily on the proposed HS3 corridor, connecting Cities across the M62 to further the ambition of creating a Northern powerhouse. There was little on HS2, other than the decision by Higgins to put a station at Crewe.
Indeed that is how the announcement yesterday panned out at the launch of his report, held in Leeds.
More interesting was the Governments formal response delivered yesterday to Parliament:
“The government, working with Transport for the North, will now produce a comprehensive transport strategy for the region. This will include options, costs and a delivery timetable for a HS3 east west rail connection. An interim report will be produced next March” – A clear timetable, not surprisingly with a report delivered just in advance of the Election to a Northern audience.
When it came to the response to HS2 – the timetable is different:
“The Report from Sir David Higgins also gives strong backing to the case for Phase Two of HS2 and sets out proposals to maximise its benefits. His proposals include bringing forward plans for a hub station at Crewe to 2027 and a fundamental review of the right solution for Leeds station to allow connections between HS2, existing rail services and improved east west connections. The government will set out its detailed plans for Phase Two in 2015″. – So unlikely before the election, or it would surely have been specified, and this is for a line where a huge amount of detailed planning has already taken place.
Now if the election does result in a significantly changed makeup of MPs in the House of Commons, what guarantee of support to take a HS2 Bill through Parliament?
So could an outcome be an HS2 line going to Birmingham. An HS3 across the M62 corridor and no high speed line connecting them?
What this also highlights is how the North is getting it’s act together – A group of the key Northern cities working closely together to develop a strong brand, vision with clear outcomes.
Compare and contrast with the West Midlands.
Are we not in danger of becoming the “squeezed middle”, sitting between the ever surging global economy of London and an emerging Northern Powerhouse.
Who is providing the Visionary leadership in the West Midlands and where are the big ideas? If we were asked what are the 3 big projects we want to see in the Region, could we provide an answer?
As cities pile in on the back of the Scottish Referendum to “Demand more powers” and “Empower” themselves, i remain unclear as to what it is they actually want and importantly who wants these powers and at what level.
On the one hand those leading the debate talk about Cities and then immediately start talking about regions – What is it the City or the Region? And if we talk about a City Region what is it and importantly who should define it?
Over recent years we have already seen substantial decentralisation to local areas – The City Deals and Growth Deals are a major shift in local prioritisation. What additional decentralisation of powers are required and how will local control make a difference?
To whom should any further powers of de-centralisation be handed to.? We are surely not suggesting to those Local Authorities which have been party to major systemic failure in the provision of services. Should it be the LEPs? well not in their present guise. They would need to be far more democratically accountable to the communities they serve.
And what of the appetite from the electorate.? The recent election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Birmingham is hardly a strong portent – A 10% turnout, with the successful candidate being elected by only 1 in 20 of those eligible to vote.
You can phrase a question ” Would you like more powers for the region?” and if you did not get a huge yes, then something would be sadly wrong – But what powers and on what terms?
The debate at this stage is too much of a knee jerk – if Scotland can be promised more then we should have them. Scotland has an identity has the West Midlands or the Midlands got one?
What we need is some clarity and thought as to: 1. What powers do we want decentralised? 2. At what geographical level do we want these powers decentralised? 3. To whom should these powers be decentralised to?
Finally, behind all of this is a suspicion that a key power is that is being sought is to raise additional income. Be careful. Look at the public finances, they are in a truly dreadful state. Tax receipts are not rising because wages are not rising. Large parts of the electorate have no spare money. They cannot afford any further charges or taxes.